Director Christopher Nolan, ever since he revived the franchise with Batman Begins (2005), seems bent on making his hero and his dilemmas more earthbound. There is an attempt to inject realism into the comics, pertinence into mere entertainment. So instead of donning bat-suits with rubberized nipples, Batman (Christian Bale) sports a body armor derived from millions of dollars' worth of military research; instead of a sleek and gadget-ridden bat-mobile, he has a tank-like armored vehicle that transforms into a battle-ready motorcycle and somehow fits in real-world physics; instead of battling for a city that resembles a horror-themed carnival, he risks everything to salvage a city that is more recognizable; instead of clear-cut villains and adulated heroes in reiterated struggles between good and evil, we get twisted identities and broken martyrs spiraling downwards in a world that thrives in sin and cynicism.
Christopher Nolan's The Dark Knightboasts of a truly memorable opening sequence: a terrifically conceived bank heist that fits better in a Michael Mann-directed caper movie than a summer flick with a caped and masked crime-fighting billionaire as its hero. The opening somehow foreshadows the film's overall tone, which is both fascinating and distracting at the same time. The double, triple, and quadruple-crossing amongst bank robbers feels like it rightly belongs in the unlimited realities of comic book literature, and when the last crook standing reveals himself as the Joker (Heath Ledger), with a Chelsea smile miserably hidden underneath a disarray of white and red paint, we are reassured we are in Gotham and that Batman is probably nearby. The milieu is of a completely different nature however: with a shot-gun wielding bank manager screaming threatening remarks about the mafia not appreciating being robbed, or the uncharacteristic ominous daylight which feels strangely unfamiliar in almost all reincarnations of Gotham, or the over-all tone of no-nonsense criminality and terrorism that pervades the scene. Nolan's Gotham in The Dark Knight is a city operating in comic book pulp and hyperbole snugged in present-day geography and politics.
Nolan presents a situation of two extreme forces: Batman's supposed good, vigilante justice that stands for order at whatever cost, and The Joker's insatiable evil, a conviction that the world can be adjusted to suit chaos if given the right impetus. In the center are Gotham's residents, district attorney Harvey Dent (Aaron Eckhart), police commissioner James Gordon (Gary Oldman), Bruce Wayne's trustworthy liaison Lucius Fox (Morgan Freeman), all of which have the capacity to either doing the right thing or completely failing. The Dark Knight, rather than fathoming the eccentricities of its characters, is more interested in measuring the moral climate of Gotham City. Will its citizens prefer to have a ferry full of crooks explode to survive? Will they kill a ruthless informant to save a hospital full of innocent victims? Will Fox invade upon the privacy of everyone to find the villain? Will Batman rescue his personal muse or his city's only hope? These are merely a few of the moral dilemmas Nolan injects his tale with. He pushes the viewer to introspection, to weighing which of the two goods are less evil. He muddles morality, the lines between right and wrong, heroism and villainy.
The Dark Knight insists on realism, of placing fictional Gotham in the map, of suggesting that the Joker be given the politically-loaded label of terrorist, of edifying Batman with his familiar brand of heroics as the unpopular yet indelible hero. This insistence on contemporary realism compounded with Nolan's intent on compounding morality is problematic, in the same way that rationalizing right-wing war activism or justifying any of Bush's deservedly unpopular policies are problematic. Gordon's verbose plea in edifying Batman in the end feels desperate, if not treacherous. From a perspective of nebulous morality which I would have preferred since I am indifferent to Batman's patriotic posturing, Nolan suddenly pontificates, revealing a forgiving if not totally absolving stance to abuses of power in favor of the so-called greater good. Adjusted to real world politics, Batman's untraditional extradition of shady businessman Lau (Chin Han) from Hong Kong can be equated to a justified interference of international borders; or Batman's dilemma-ridden usage of his sonar tracking gadget can be equated to a dubious use of police power in furtherance of a warrantable purpose. I can imagine countless politicians, warlords, and dictators fancying themselves as Batmans in their respective jurisdictions, breaking a few rules in furtherance of a perceived order in society.
The Dark Knightis first and foremost created to entertain and as entertainment, it's largely successful save for a few bothersome imperfections. Nolan carries over from Batman Begins his inability to direct an action sequence, the best example of this sterility is the botched and almost incoherent fight sequence in the parking lot which ends with Batman being bitten by a huge canine. It surely kept me glued to my seat for over two hours, where I was relishing Ledger's misanthropic approximations before his predictable performance is overpowered by Eckhart's more tragic creation. The Dark Knighthowever has been prematurely committed a status of reverence, backed up by all the box office records it broke, all the discerning critics it wowed, not to mention the legions of dedicated fans who are willing to kill or at least threaten to kill those who dare put a dent on the film's near-immaculate early reputation. Let's keep it however has been prematurely committed a status of reverence, backed up by all the box office records it broke, all the discerning critics it wowed, not to mention the legions of dedicated fans who are willing to kill or at least threaten to kill those who dare put a dent on the film's near-immaculate early reputation. Let's keep it earthbound, a film that is to be assessed both as a product of and a reaction to these cynical times.
While I agree that much of the film, and especially the conclusion, seem to forgive the "abuses of power in favor of the so-called greater good," I think Nolan had a little bit of sense to not lean entirely that way.
When Batman pursues Lau, it's pointed out that the caped crusader knows no jurisdiction or borders. Lau may be safe from Gotham, but even in Hong Kong, he's not safe from the Bat. Part of me finds it hard to believe that anyone can see this as a 100% good thing when paralleled to the real world. I get the sense that Nolan is muttering through the side of his mouth, "By the way, don't do what he's doing. You shouldn't do that..." I know, it's weak, but I feel it's there. (For some reason I'm having a terrible time explaining myself here...)
Also, we must remember that the film is called "The Dark Knight." I know that the film plays with the title as Dent constantly reminds us that the "night is darkest before the dawn," but I think it should also be looked at a little more literally. Nolan said there are specific reasons for naming the film "The Dark Knight," and I believe part of it is because Bruce finds himself doing some pretty dark things, such as the invasion of privacy, the extradition of Lau, etc. And even though the film kind of plays if off and seems to say, "well, people were saved, so it was okay," there is that constant reminder that perhaps it's not the best way. Alfred is constantly warning Bruce that his actions will have some dire consequences. Batman needs to decide if innocent lives and broken morals are worth it. He obviously decides that yes, they are, but I think Nolan would be okay with some people disagreeing.
Hi Pacheco, thanks for dropping by... brilliant observations there, and while I agree that Nolan doesn't seem to be leaning towards that, I couldn't help but feel betrayed by that penultimate pontification by Gordon, which in a purely artistic context, is a downright letdown, and placing the film in the bigger realm of political philosophy, dangerous. I thoroughly enjoyed Nolan's suggestion of expanding ethic from merely good and evil, to two goods but with variations of evil, etc., but the resolve wasn't as brave as it could've been.
I must say, a great review all the way, and I agree with 90 % of that what you said. I too got the impression Nolan secretly inserted a political subtext in the film, which is interesting.
As a whole, I enjoyed the film, yet I need to see it again to strengthen my view on it. Personally, I thought the Lau subplot was rather unnecessary and that the story had too many subplots in general, but I was entertained by every second of the film.
Mr. and Mrs. Cruz (Sigrid Andrea Bernardo, 2018)
-
*Where do broken hearts go?*
This question was asked to a female colleague in our company. Her reply was
Sagada. I don't know if she's a movie buff but ...
2017: Year in TV
-
With thousands of TV shows being released every year, it is becoming more
and more difficult (and impossible) to track, catch up, and pick your
favorites. ...
Note 4: Nonface, Interlude, Lav Diaz and Time
-
*The face withheld - a secret.*
*1. *
*The Nonface in Class Picture1*
*[This article was published in Kino Punch (Issue 3), U.P. Cinema's Film
Critiqu...
SEARCH FOR WENG WENG: Week #2 update!
-
Dear friends and colleagues,
As you may have heard, I'm currently running a crowdfunding campaign to
finish my THE SEARCH FOR WENG WENG documentary -
...
Danton (1983).
-
Danton – Andrzej Wajda Andrzej Wajda’s Danton (1983) begins with the
titular character, Georges Danton (Gerard Depardieu), one of the most
prominent leader...
TAKLUB (Brillante Mendoza, 2015)
-
Not quite so simple to work on a project with a measure of autonomy when
forces of influence must be looking over your shoulder, presumably
kibitzing, p...
Dear Film Development Council of the Philippines
-
You have the mandate to start the National Film Archive. I have heard that
your first priority project in relation to archiving is the digitization of
some...
45 jordans_nike persona
-
Nikehaslongbeenaleaderintheathleticfootwearandapparelindustry,knownforitsinnovativedesignsandcommitmenttoperformance.ThisarticleexploresNike'sbrandidentity,p...
The Last Post Ever About "Indie"
-
For the past decade, the so-called Independent scene has been mostly
dependent to financing bodies run by almost the same people who almost
serve the sam...
Breaking It to You Gently
-
Dear friends, It’s been a while. You have probably forgotten about this
blog. We have all moved on. We have carried on with the more important
aspects of o...
Done with Cinemalaya X
-
Break muna ako sa latest CinemalayaX scandal. This year has a superb
lineup, though I was only able to watch 11 films (the number does not
include all th...
LONG DAY'S JOURNEY INTO NIGHT
-
[image: May be an image of 1 person and lighting]
The first half abstracts itself to such a fragmented degree its noir
romance becomes slippery to the p...
Elevator
-
Score: 3.55 5 Ratings Genre: Drama, Romance Synopsis: Trapped inside the
elevator of a hotel casino complex, a lowly elevator boy falls in love with
his in...
Favorite Foreign Films of 2014
-
*Special Mention:*
The Tale of the Princess Kaguya, dir. Isao Takahata
20) The One I Love, dir. Charlie McDowell
19) Labor Day, dir. Jason Reitman
1...
EVERYBODY HUSTLES
-
Everybody hustles, but in Monti Puno Parungao's *The Escort*
(Lexuality Entertainment, Treemount Pictures, 2011) hustling (in the hard
core sense o...
Ha Ha Ha (South Korea, 2010)
-
Because last Saturday's drink up was strange. "Drinking down memory lane,"
a drunken text message, slurred across time (the flooding of memory) and
space ...
Ilang Tala sa mga Paborito Kong Short Film sa 2015
-
Paborito kong excuse ang “maling audience” kapag nanonood ako ng mga
experimental film sa Pinas. Gusto ko ang mga pelikulang pinapag-isip ako
pero hesita...
Singapore International Film Festival 2017!
-
In November 2017 I was invited to the Singapore International Film Festival
(SGIFF) to take part in their Asian Bonds program. SGIFF flew me from and
ba...
Not Another Manileño-Kids-Trooping-to-a-Party Video
-
Turn It Well Artist: Up Dharma Down Director: Caloy Soliongco Cast: Paul
Diaz, Dee Jae Paeste, Gino Jose, Martin Antunez, Haizel Fernando 2012 I
love Up Dh...
Snowpiercer (2013)
-
Ever wonder what it's like having the entire human race jammed in one
cramp, perpetually-running locomotive? Korean filmmaker Bong Joon-ho shows
how cra...
Crowdfunding 201: Best Friends Forever
-
*A long time ago, I wrote a column for Turnstyle News (a project of
yr.media) called "Crowdfunding 201" that aimed to dig deeper into what did
and did not ...
Muallaf (The Convert) - Discussion with Film Cast
-
Hosted by The Center for Global Muslim Life, this was held online about 2
days ago. For fans of Yasmin Ahmad, her cast, and the film, needless to say
this ...
Two Mules for Sister Sara | 4K UHD Blu-ray Review
-
A timeless classic, 'It's a Wonderful Life' shines on 4K UHD with an
astounding picture and impeccable sound, now enhanced by a collector's
SteelBook editi...
The Carpetbaggers
-
Edward Dmytryk - 1964 KL Studio Classics BD Region A There is an inspired
moment in The Carpetbaggers where the camera rests on the entry to a
bathroom in ...
Short Personal Update - New Ebooks
-
Since my last round of publishing on Ghibli Blog, I have published another
round of art & photography ebooks. The newest titles are Galaxy Four:
Modern ...
Memories of Edward Copeland
-
For a time at my home blog, *Thrilling Days of Yesteryear*, I meticulously
documented the passings of people in the entertainment industry in the form
of...
Balance
-
Hello to my future self and to the approximately six people who might see
this at some point!
It's cyclical and endless: thinking about how to align and ...
The First Oscar Eligibility Lists are Here!
-
by Cláudio Alves
*PIECE BY PIECE is the only film competing in both the ANIMATED and
DOCUMENTARY Oscar races.*
At long last, AMPAS has started divulging...
Hidden Histories: The Story of Women Film Editors
-
*I've written an essay for Criterion on women film editors. It was inspired
by Su Friedrich's website, Edited By, a wonderful, invaluable labor of love
d...
SFFILM Day 14: Asako I & II
-
*The 62st San Francisco International Film Festival holds its final
screenings today. Each day during the festival I've posted about a festival
selection I...
25 of the 21st century
-
-
This blog is basically dead. I hadn't intended to retire it but life moves
on and Blogger feels like a pretty outdated platform these days. I
certai...
Sydney Film Festival 2014
-
*SYDNEY FILM FESTIVAL 2014*
As the programmer of the Sydney Film Festival Hub, I live in Town Hall
during the Festival, and don't get to see many films. Bu...
Been a Long Time
-
Five years later, a new post! Alas, it's just a quick note to say that,
while I no longer have time to maintain or update this blog, I'll be
keeping it onl...
MY FACEBOOK COMMENTS
-
กรี๊ดดดดดดดดดดดด พอเห็นชื่อ EL NORTE (1983, Gregory Nava, 141min) แล้วเราก็เลยเพิ่งจำได้ว่า
อาจารย์แดงเคยฉายหนังเรื่องนี้ทางวิดีโอเทปในงานอะไรสักอย่างท...
favorite films
-
Notes.
Bumped to the top of my blog for easy access.
20 films. Chronological. 1 film per director. I have given my top 5 special
pictures. I do plan to expa...
A memorial slide show for David
-
After David’s memorial service in May (a video recording of which is
permanently on Vimeo with no password necessary), some people on my
Facebook page aske...
The Snarkout Boys and the Avocado of Death
-
From a very early age my parents instilled in me a love of movies. Some of
my earliest memories are of seeing an animated Raggedy Ann and Andy movie
i...
April 2015 Film Preview
-
Summer blockbuster season is just around the corner, but there's no need to
wait until then to see a great movie. April brings us a wide variety of
women-c...
National Silent Movie Day: Manhandled (1924)
-
Wednesday, Sept. 29, 2021, is National Silent Movie Day. New York City's
beloved Film Forum is celebrating with a screening of Allan Dwan's 1924
silent...
THE TEXAS CHAINSAW MASSACRE (1974) at 50
-
*The Texas Chainsaw Massacre *(1974; Tobe Hooper) never showed in my
hometown when it was released in 1974. The closest it ever came was a
hundred mil...
Summer 2023 Blu-ray/4K Ultra Consumer Guide
-
Equipment: Sony UBP-X800 multi-region 4K player, Sony KD50X690E display,
Yamaha RXV-385 A/V receiver. Angel Face (Warner Archive Blu-ray) Of all the
amour ...
Breaking Down The Great Wall
-
Even if you live outside China and have not yet been able to see The Great
Wall for yourself, you’ve probably overheard or contributed to one or both
of th...
Tale of Cinema 극장전 (Hong Sang-soo, 2005)
-
(This post is in conjunction with the Museum of the Moving Image's
retrospective, "Tales of Cinema: The Films of Hong Sang-soo," screening
through June ...
Related Images | “Witches”
-
*Related Images invites readers behind the scenes and into the sketchbooks
of working filmmakers to learn more about their creative processes.*
*Elizabeth S...
Maya Miriga (1984)
-
Forty years after its original premiere, the Odia film Maya Miriga (1984),
a touchstone of the Parallel Cinema movement, will be presented in a
restored ve...
Il Buco (Frammartino)
-
Il Buco | Film complet | ARTE Cinema (YouTube) 1h30'(ARTE) 19 Novembre
2024Film complet visible sur la chaîne YT d'Arte (ou en Replay sur Arte TV)
jusqu'a...
Out to pasture
-
Covering Thai cinema and living in Thailand for the past decade or so has
been an illuminating experience, one that I'm not sure whether I'll regret.
I s...
10 comments:
great review. keep up the good work!
While I agree that much of the film, and especially the conclusion, seem to forgive the "abuses of power in favor of the so-called greater good," I think Nolan had a little bit of sense to not lean entirely that way.
When Batman pursues Lau, it's pointed out that the caped crusader knows no jurisdiction or borders. Lau may be safe from Gotham, but even in Hong Kong, he's not safe from the Bat. Part of me finds it hard to believe that anyone can see this as a 100% good thing when paralleled to the real world. I get the sense that Nolan is muttering through the side of his mouth, "By the way, don't do what he's doing. You shouldn't do that..." I know, it's weak, but I feel it's there. (For some reason I'm having a terrible time explaining myself here...)
Also, we must remember that the film is called "The Dark Knight." I know that the film plays with the title as Dent constantly reminds us that the "night is darkest before the dawn," but I think it should also be looked at a little more literally. Nolan said there are specific reasons for naming the film "The Dark Knight," and I believe part of it is because Bruce finds himself doing some pretty dark things, such as the invasion of privacy, the extradition of Lau, etc. And even though the film kind of plays if off and seems to say, "well, people were saved, so it was okay," there is that constant reminder that perhaps it's not the best way. Alfred is constantly warning Bruce that his actions will have some dire consequences. Batman needs to decide if innocent lives and broken morals are worth it. He obviously decides that yes, they are, but I think Nolan would be okay with some people disagreeing.
Thanks anonymous, I'll try...
Hi Pacheco, thanks for dropping by... brilliant observations there, and while I agree that Nolan doesn't seem to be leaning towards that, I couldn't help but feel betrayed by that penultimate pontification by Gordon, which in a purely artistic context, is a downright letdown, and placing the film in the bigger realm of political philosophy, dangerous. I thoroughly enjoyed Nolan's suggestion of expanding ethic from merely good and evil, to two goods but with variations of evil, etc., but the resolve wasn't as brave as it could've been.
I see what you're saying. And I think I agree, it's sort of as if there was no follow-through with the swing (whatever that swing may be).
Burton forever!
Burton's films, I can watch over and over again. Nolan's are, like any of his other movies, good for one, or maybe two go's.
Cool Motor and Uniform
Uhhh, cool...
I must say, a great review all the way, and I agree with 90 % of that what you said. I too got the impression Nolan secretly inserted a political subtext in the film, which is interesting.
As a whole, I enjoyed the film, yet I need to see it again to strengthen my view on it. Personally, I thought the Lau subplot was rather unnecessary and that the story had too many subplots in general, but I was entertained by every second of the film.
Thank you, Marin.
Post a Comment