Give Up Tomorrow (Michael Collins, 2011)
The convicted men were predictably seen as spoiled scions of the few members of the wealthy elite. The most prominent accused, Francisco “Paco” Larrañaga, is at first glance, the very personification of the country’s social divide. With his fair skin, brown eyes, and foreign features, he does not look like most Filipinos. His mother is a distant relative of a former president. His father is a Spanish citizen. His gazes are intense, almost angry. He talks with a cadence that is too assured and easily mistakable as indifference and arrogance. His eventual fall from grace, starting from his celebrated arrest to that final conviction by the highest court of the land, is therefore the logical happy ending to the escapist entertainment that the case has evolved into.
Director Michael Collins and producer Marty Syjuco’s Give Up Tomorrow presents the fatedly intertwined stories of the Chiongs and the Larrañagas from a specific perspective, that of those closer and more intimate to the perceived victimizers than the victim. At first glance, the obvious tilt to sympathize with Paco seems problematic as it clouds the documentary, pushing it further away from being a portrait of a frustratingly neglected truth into something that resembles propaganda. As it turns out, the documentary, with its skillfully presented pieces of evidence that pertains to the alleged miscarriage of justice, serves both purposes seamlessly.
The documentary’s strongest sequences are those that featured real footage from the prolonged trial, edited together with various interviews with shelved witnesses and emotional relatives, unflinchingly revealing the folly that was instantaneously believed and consumed in the heat of the moment. The film’s most sobering moments are those depicting Paco, from when he was snatched from the good life up to several years after when he is still serving a sentence for a crime he allegedly did not commit, insisting on his innocence, mouthing the mantra from which the title of the documentary was borrowed. Its portrayal of the two mothers, one whose obsession with her being a victim has allowed her to mold the system to suit her cause and the other whose trust in the system had turned herself and her family into its unsuspecting victims, is at once astounding and melancholic.
As it methodically shatters the official truth as narrated and explained by the various decisions of the trial and appellate courts, it also shatters the precious comfort and security that the processes that came up with the official truths provide. As it navigates the glaring flaws of a distinct judicial system through the experiences of Paco, it exposes the immense cracks of any system or institution tasked to retain both order and justice that is created and run by corruptible and erring men. More than swaying sympathies towards the already maligned convicts, Give Up Tomorrow espouses vigilance, especially in this age where truth is easily adaptable to the needs of the powerful.
Give Up Tomorrow acknowledges the gravity and importance of its cause, skirting away from too much style and spectacle and focusing instead on the scope and breadth of its material. Despite its very straightforward presentation, it is an admittedly difficult film to sit through. It is immensely heartbreaking, balancing the indelible pain of seeing an entire system that for years has been entrusted to set things right shamelessly crumble and being asked to accept the very possible reality that an innocent man has wasted his best years in jail, all for the benefit of keeping a tumultuous mob sated.
(Cross-published in Twitch.)
5 comments:
That was also my problem with the film at first. I'm not sure if you were aware that Marty Syjuco is somehow related to the Larrañaga's. I was most fascinated with the scenes inside Paco's prison cell, the scenes in court and the candid interviews with the mother of the Chiong sisters. I saw it more as a film rather than a documentary because of its heightened drama...
Yeah, I'm aware that Marty is related to Paco. The filmmakers never hid that fact, and in my opinion, it made the documentary more charged. What others may perceive as bias can be considered by most as motivation.
Paco Larrañaga's mother is a granddaughter of Don Sergio Osmeña....hardly distant. I am looking forward to seeing this film when it is aired on Public Broadcasting System here in the US in early October. I regret it will not make the Philippine judicial system look good.
I saw the film in a special screening in UP Diliman, na d it was really an uncomfortable, yet extremely heartbreaking and rewarding sit through.
I made me angry. I can hear distant groans of disappointment inside the theater.
It is a powerful film, indeed, showing the tragedy of a misled "justice" system of the Philippines.
But the problem is that despite the overwhelming evidence that others are guilty. Despite the fact that Estrada intervened to ensure misjustice and protection for his criminal friends a drug lord of Cebu. Despite the fact that the victims father was obviously punished for threatening to give evidence against this drug lord. Despite all this, they are still in jail, Estrada is free and standing for election and Teddy Locsin who fed the frenzy also has never been made accountable along with the rest of the vile media of the Philippines.
And still no protests, nobody trying to right a wrong and the real villains are still drug lords with protection from the state.
The police are still the biggest criminal organization in the Philippines and nobody is even trying anymore to right a wrong.
Estrada should be in jail for his actions. Locsin should be made to answer for his mis-reports as well as the rest of the vile media of this land. Also the police should be investigated for their part as security services for gangsters by fixing and setting up innocent men to protect a drug lord and killer and rape organizer. Above all the drug lord still has a major business in Cebu and is still protected by the police. Somebody do something for gods sake./
Post a Comment